avg_internet_security.jpgAVG Internet Security 8.0 is the latest version of the complete home security package from the company that made a name for itself by offering powerful, free antivirus software to the masses. It’s a pretty comprehensive suite of tools designed to protect all areas of your system, with a particular emphasis on online threats.

During installation you can choose to enable the AVG Security Toolbar, which uses the LinkScanner component to allow for real-time protection against malicious Web pages and automatic downloads. You also have the option here to perform a software and definition update, and create a schedule for automatic scanning.

It’s a pretty fast process, and before long you’re taken to the main interface, where you can monitor the level of protection via a set of 12 icons covering areas such as anti-virus, anti-spyware and the firewall. You can turn each of these components on and off individually to customise your level of security, but strangely certain components such as anti-virus or anti-spam don’t appear to offer any customisation features, instead simply reporting whether the component is up to date.

 

In order to tweak your preferences in these more obscure areas you’ll need to trawl through an advanced settings menu, which isn’t particularly friendly and doesn’t really make the software any easier to use.

To enable the firewall you’ll need to run an initial wizard to generate a configuration file for your machine. This scans your computer to find out what applications should be allowed access to the Internet, so is a necessary process to prevent you from being bombarded with confirmation requests.

Again this is straightforward enough, but again you’ll find that you appear to get little control over how applications and components are managed. To change priorities or access levels you’ll need to go through another advanced menu, which, while offering a good degree of control and fine-tuning - including the ability to configure adapters, system and network services - isn’t particularly clear or as nice to use as the more traditional structure offered by most rivals.

Results of a full system scan were pretty good. Although most of the detected items were Internet cookies, it did pick up all of the malicious ‘test’ files we copied onto the system to try to trip it up. It’s worth noting here that AVG installs most of its components as separate processes, which, while a little frustrating from a clutter point of view, doesn’t actually slow your system down too badly. Processor usage rarely ventured beyond about 50 percent during a full scan, and only on occasion did we notice system slowdown when performing other tasks.

When you fire up a Web browser you’ll see the AVG Toolbar, which if enabled will scan each site returned by a search query for potentially malicious content and show a green tick to indicate that it’s safe to visit. Any sites you visit directly are also scanned before they’re loaded, so you get a good degree of protection here.

We were left with mixed feelings about AVG 8.0. On one hand it seems to want to appear nicely automated and easy for beginners, since many of the more advanced options are tucked away. On the other hand the list of individual security tools does seem rather verbose, and we weren’t particularly impressed by the way the interface is put together.

But performance does seem quite good, there’s a comprehensive range of security, and automatically monitoring your system or performing scans doesn’t appear to be too resource-hungry.

avg_antivirus.jpgThere’s little point reiterating the proliferation of online threats in the modern online world, so instead let’s look at the latest release of a popular remedy. GriSoft has, for many years, provided a free version of its popular anti-virus solution AVG, and it has done so again with the new 7.5 edition.

The free edition, as you’d expect, is a stripped-down version of the Professional version the company sells (and tries to upgrade you to), but the truth is it has enough functionality to serve the majority of home users.

Available, although not easy to find, from the main GriSoft site, once downloaded the software takes you through its simple installation. It also wants to check for the latest updates (and it’s wise to comply), and once in place, part of the program’s daily routine is to download a daily update. This is included in the free version too.

It then moves on to tackling a full system scan, which again it likes to do on a regular basis, and on our test systems (a Core 2-based laptop with a 120GB hard drive, and a Socket 939 Athlon 64 desktop with 80GB drive) the scan took between 25 and 45 minutes.

Available, although not easy to find, from the main GriSoft site, once downloaded the software takes you through its simple installation. It also wants to check for the latest updates (and it’s wise to comply), and once in place, part of the program’s daily routine is to download a daily update. This is included in the free version too.

It then moves on to tackling a full system scan, which again it likes to do on a regular basis, and on our test systems (a Core 2-based laptop with a 120GB hard drive, and a Socket 939 Athlon 64 desktop with 80GB drive) the scan took between 25 and 45 minutes.

It does have quite a system overhead, especially on single core machines, and it’s obvious when a scan is taking place. You can still word-process, browse and e-mail, but we struggled with anything much more demanding. The scan was accurate and correct in picking up problems, though, and we were content with the level of virus protection it offered over a month-long test.

Our only other niggle is that we would have preferred a summation screen that made it clear when problems had been discovered and when the system was clean. A screen is presented, but the information isn’t as transparent as it could be.

 

On-demand virus scanning isn’t the only tool in the program’s armoury, though, with a Resident Shield that scans files and documents on-the-fly, and a competent e-mail scanner that works with popular mail clients to check your mail on the way into your machine. Again there’s an overhead here, albeit a small one, as the program delays incoming post slightly while it runs its checks.

AVG Free 7.5 is happy to carry on doing its work without intervention, but there’s a friendly Control Center application that glues the constituent parts together. From here you can manually initiate updates and scans, rearrange the program’s schedules and disable parts of its work.

In all, it’s a competent security program (albeit missing some further security elements that would be of use to the standard system), which naturally offers excellent value for money. We’d be perfectly happy recommending it for use on a home system, although for PCs where more sensitive work is being done, it’s worth spending some money, especially given the modest price of the likes of F-Secure, or even the Professional Edition of AVG

Microsoft Corp. has pounced on slumping Internet icon Yahoo Inc. with an unsolicited takeover offer of $44.6 billion in its boldest bid yet to challenge Google Inc.’s dominance of the lucrative online search and advertising markets. The Justice Department says it is interested in reviewing antitrust issues associated with it.

The surprise offer of $31 per share, made late Thursday and announced Friday, seizes on Yahoo’s weakness while Microsoft tries to muscle up in a high-stakes battle with Google likely to define the technology landscape for years to come.

In a statement Friday, Yahoo said it will “carefully and promptly” study Microsoft’s bid.

With its profits steadily sliding, Yahoo’s stock slipped to a four-year low earlier this week and a new management team has been trying to steer a turnaround but sees more turbulence through 2008.

The announcement lifted Yahoo’s share price by almost 50 percent in morning trading, while Google fell almost 8 percent, dragged down by a fourth-quarter earnings report that missed Wall Street expectations.

In conference call Friday morning, Microsoft Chief Executive Steve Ballmer indicated he won’t take no for an answer after Yahoo rebuffed takeover overtures a year ago.

“This is a decision we have — and I have — thought long and hard about,” Ballmer said. “We are confident it’s the right path for Microsoft and Yahoo.”

To underscore its resolve, Microsoft is offering a 62 percent premium to Yahoo’s closing stock price Thursday. If the deal is consummated, it would be by far the largest acquisition in Microsoft’s history, eclipsing last year’s $6 billion purchase of online ad service aQuantive.

Since reaching a 52-week high of $34.08 in October, Yahoo shares have fallen 46 percent. Yahoo climbed $9.41 a share, or 49 percent, to $28.59 in morning trading. Microsoft shares fell $1.43, or 4.4 percent, to $31.17.

Microsoft publicly disclosed its cash-and-stock offer in hopes of rallying support from Yahoo’s shareholders, making it more difficult for Yahoo’s board to turn down the bid.

In a letter released Friday, Ballmer pointedly noted Yahoo’s financial performance has deteriorated since Microsoft was spurned a year ago. At that time, Ballmer said he was told Yahoo believed it was better off on its own.

“A year has gone by, and the competitive situation has not improved,” Ballmer wrote in his letter.

Microsoft’s previous offer was rebuffed by Terry Semel, who stepped aside last year as chief executive under shareholder pressure.

Microsoft sent its latest takeover offer to Yahoo late Thursday, shortly after Semel resigned as the company’s chairman. The letter is addressed to Semel’s successors, new Chairman Roy Bostock and the current CEO, co-founder Jerry Yang, who is one of Yahoo’s largest shareholders.

In a prepared statement, Yahoo said its board “will evaluate this proposal carefully and promptly in the context of Yahoo’s strategic plans and pursue the best course of action to maximize long-term value for shareholders.”

Microsoft views Yahoo as its best chance to thwart Google, which has leveraged its leadership in Internet search and advertising to emerge as an increasingly serious threat to the world’s largest software maker’s persuasive influence on how people interact with computers.

Google already controls nearly 60 percent of the U.S. search market, and has been widening its lead, despite concerted efforts by both second-place Yahoo and third-place Microsoft. By combining, Microsoft and Yahoo would have a 33 percent share of the U.S. search market, according to the latest data from comScore Media Metrix.

By joining forces, Microsoft and Yahoo also would widen their narrowing advantage over Google in providing free e-mail accounts — a service that helps foster more loyalty with users and create more advertising opportunities.

Advertisers around the world are expected to double their spending on the Internet during the next three years as more people get their news and entertainment on the Web instead of television, radio, newspapers and magazine. The trend is expected to create an $80 billion online ad market in 2010, up from an estimated $40 billion last year.

Despite an aggressive push in recent years, Microsoft’s online advertising expansion hasn’t paid off. Last week, the Redmond, Wash.-based company reported a 79 percent jump in its overall profit, but its online division’s loss widened to $245 million.

And Yahoo has been struggling to attract more advertising even though its Web site attracts one of the biggest audiences. The Sunnyvale-based company’s profit has declined for five consecutive quarters, prompting plans to cut 1,000 jobs later this month, a 7 percent reduction of its 14,300-employee work force.

Besides helping to boost its online ad revenue, Microsoft believes it could mine more profit from Yahoo by jettisoning workers and eliminating overlapping operations.

Microsoft said it sees at least $1 billion in cost savings if it buys Yahoo. Microsoft executives deflected questions about how many jobs might be lost, but the company emphasized retention packages will be offered to Yahoo engineers and other key employees, including some executives.

The fate of Yahoo’s brand also is unclear if Microsoft takes over. Both Ballmer and Kevin Johnson, president of Microsoft’s platforms and services division, hailed Yahoo’s strong brand value but didn’t commit to keeping the name alive.

Source: Yahoo! News

Sun Buys MySQL For $1 Billion

January 22nd, 2008

Open source enthusiasts were reeling this week when Sun Microsystems announced that it will be purchasing MySQL AB, the company behind the development of the popular MySQL database software, for US $1 billion.

The spin from both camps was positive, but what does the deal mean for web developers? And what impact is it likely to have on other open source projects?

To attempt to answer these questions, we need to look at a number of factors, including Sun’s history with open source technologies, its competitors, and the success of other open source technologies that have been commercialized.

While it’s not without its detractors, there’s no denying that Sun has a pretty solid history when it comes to involvement in the open source world. The company claims to be the biggest contributor to the open source community, a claim that, based upon its release of the Solaris source code in 2005, and the Java programming language in 2006, is difficult to refute.

But there is other evidence of Sun understanding the value of keeping software open source and free: projects like OpenOffice.org and NetBeans have healthy communities and promising road maps. In fact, if you examine Sun’s current offerings to the corporate world, the only key component missing from the portfolio (and one that competitors such as Oracle, IBM, and Microsoft already offer) is a database. MySQL, with over 10 million installations worldwide (including high-traffic sites such as Google and Facebook) is a natural fit.

One concern that web developers may have is that the licensing terms will change — what if Sun decides to start charging a licensing fee for each of the installations of MySQL?

In my opinion, this just won’t happen, simply because Sun realizes that it hasn’t bought a database — it’s bought a community. A community of employees, developers, and clients.

Related to this is the question of whether development of the cross-platform releases of MySQL will stagnate, with Sun’s energy being focused on compatibility with the Solaris platform. Here’s what MySQL’s VP of Community Relations, Kaj Arnö, had to say on the matter:

“I don’t expect (the development of MySQL on Solaris) in any way to be at the cost of other popular operating systems (Linux, Windows, Mac OS/X, other Unixes etc.) or development environments (PHP, Ruby on Rails, Perl, Python, ODBC, C++, C#, VB etc.). MySQL grew with LAMP, and MySQL without LAMP at its core is simply unimaginable. It was MySQL’s part of LAMP that interested Sun in the first place. Hence I don’t see Sun having a platform migration strategy, but to continue to be an integral part of the dot in .com.”

In short, Sun understands the business model around open source software, and it wouldn’t have invested $1 billion into a company only to screw over its users for a short-term profit when the long-term prospects — driving MySQL into the corporate arena with paid support — look so bright. There are plenty of other open source databases (PostgreSQL, for example) with comparable features and performance that customers would quickly migrate to if they were unhappy.

And as for the figure paid by Sun? While some would suggest the number was low given the size of the MySQL user base, $1 billion is a lot of money in anyone’s eyes. Let’s take a look at some other recent open source acquisitions [source]:

  • US$210 million for SUSE Linux (Novell)
  • US$400 million for JBoss (Red Hat)
  • US$500 million for XenSource (Citrix)
  • US$350 million for Zimbra (Yahoo!)

I’d say the MySQL team would be feeling pretty happy with themselves right now. Who said there was no money in open source software?

AdSense for mobile allows publishers to generate earnings from their mobile webpages using targeted Google ads. Just like AdSense for content, with AdSense for mobile Google matches ads to the content of your site — in this case, your mobile website. You’ll earn money whenever your mobile website’s visitors click on your ads. AdSense for mobile is available in a limited number of locations.

In addition to our standard program policies, publishers wishing to participate in AdSense for mobile must also comply with the following policies specific to mobile-compliant webpages.

Website Requirements:

Webpages must be mobile-compliant and developed with a server-side scripting language such as PHP; AdSense for mobile ad code will not display ads on standard webpages.

Mobile Webpage Markup Languages:

  • wml (WAP 1.x.)
  • xhtml (WAP 2.0)
  • chtml (imode, etc.)

Ad Placement and Behavior

  • Only one AdSense for mobile ad unit may be displayed per mobile webpage.
  • A “double” ad unit can only be placed on the bottom of the page, but may appear above the page’s footer (e.g. navigational links, copyright messages, etc.).
  • Google ads displayed on a publisher’s mobile-compliant webpage may not be modified or obscured in any way.
  • After a user click, display of the advertiser’s landing page may not be interrupted or prevented in any way. For instance, publishers may not display their own interstitial pages before taking users to the advertiser’s website.

Site accessibility

Our crawler must be able to access your mobile webpages to provide relevant ads. For more information, please see our entry on mobile ad targeting.

From Google

Posted in Google | No Comments »

Description

After watching a video in a Web site, you may want to save the video file into your local disk for playing it offline in the future. If the video file is stored in your browser’s cache, this utility can help you to extract the video file from the cache and save it for watching it in the future.
It automatically scans the entire cache of Internet Explorer and Mozilla-based Web browsers (Including Firefox) and finds all video files that are currently stored in it. It allows you to easily copy the cached video files into another folder for playing/watching them in the future. If you have a movie player that is configured to play flv files, it also allows you to play the video directly from your browser’s cache.

Known Problems And Limitations

  • In some Video Web sites, including YouTube, the video files are not always saved in the cached by the Web browser. When the video file is not saved in the cache, you won’t be able to watch it or to copy it to another folder.
    If you use a Web browser based on Mozilla (including Firefox), VideoCacheView will provide a link to download the video file, even if the file itself is not stored in the cache. Due to technical limitation, this feature is not available for Internet Explorer browser.
  • For Mozilla-based Web browser (including Firefox), you should close the Web browser in order to view the latest video files that you watched.

Read the rest of this entry »

Samsung solidifies its leadership position in Flash memory technology with the all-Flash Solid State Drive. The Samsung SSD looks like a hard disk drive, but it definitely doesn’t act like one.

That’s due to the NAND Flash inside. It’s the basis for the SSD’s remarkable reliability, blazing speed,

low total cost of ownership, virtually unlimited shock resistance and meager power consumption. Compare the SSD and HDD and you’ll understand why Popular Mechanics selected the Samsung SSD for a 2007 Breakthrough Award.

The advantages give products designed around any member of the Samsung SSD lineup breakthrough capabilities that define a new generation of computing. What else would you use to drive your system?


Samsung Solid State Drive

Hard-disk drives are the out-of-shape kids in computer gym class. While a PC’s other components (CPU, GPU and RAM) operate at lightning-fast speeds, the drive huffs and puffs and spins as fast as possible to try to keep up. Flash memory is far speedier and, because it has no moving parts, is resistant to mechanical failure. Samsung’s new Solid State Drives (the samples we received were oxymoronically labeled “solid state disks”) are essentially big bundles of flash memory—up to 64GB—that replace traditional hard drives. Laptops using SSDs are lighter, faster and quieter than those with conventional drives. As price comes down and capacities increase, all computers may give up spinning disks for SSDs.

Source: http://www.samsungssd.com

Posted in New Tech | No Comments »

Empire Earth 3 Released

November 9th, 2007

Empire Earth III

Format PC
Developer Mad Doc Software
Publisher Vivendi
Genre Sim / Strategy

One of Empire Earth III’s weapons really sucks. Which would be an uncharacteristically harsh judgement to make of a game that’s just making its first faltering steps into the public spotlight, except I mean it in a good way.

I’m talking about the firearm mounted on an ED-209-esque robot that creates a pinhole singularity in the battlefield. Watch tanks tremble, trying to escape the pull before getting flipped off their tracks and tumbling towards the event horizon. It’s even more impressive when deployed in a settlement, with roofing ripped off before the whole edifice submits.

While that’s just one of the units, it’s a good example of the change in tone. Empire Earth II, while solid enough, was a distinctly unglamourous wander through the choicest parts of humanity’s history in an RTS fashion. Its handful of novel features were dressing on a very traditional, even staid, core. Thankfully, Mad Doc have decided a conservative approach is no longer appropriate. EE3 is actually a little radical.

A new freeform campaign structure borrows a few pages from Total War - except rather than being constrained to one period, you play across the entirety of history, starting with clubs and ending with sexy futuretech. Decide where your armies are going to head on the attractive spinning globe - after a suitable pause for cackling “One day all this will be mine, mu-ha-ha” - and then enter a skirmish game to decide who wins and loses.

Anything you discover is unlocked for your entire civilisation, rather than you having to stomp up the tech tree on each level. Survivors of the battle will be available on the strategic map to either garrison the new area or form the core of your onward-marching army. Similarly, any buildings you’ve constructed in an area will remain if an AI player invades. Many developers have tried to reduce the amount of dead time any RTS game starts with while you’re building infrastructure, but few have gone nearly as far as Empire Earth.

Battles are more than straight skirmishes too, sub-missions spawning as you enter an area, depending on the current situation (which area it is, your tech level, what the prophets read in the open belly of a goat). For example, near the start of the game a local tribe might have their princess stolen, and you can rescue her to gain their allegiance. As you progress, you’ll increasingly be given missions on the strategic level, such as conquering three of a faction’s provinces to precipitate Empire Earth’s equivalent of the collapse of the Soviet Union.

The actual real-time strategy is also a considerable departure. While still based on historical fact, a broader, more exaggerated look prevails, much like you’d expect if Blizzard designed an historical RTS. And rather than the many civilisations previous games simulated shallowly, EE3’s three generalised ones - western, middle-eastern and far-eastern - each have far more unique unit progressions and specialised hero types. Some comic touches are already evident in the voiceovers.

At this stage, everything seems more alive than in previous games. In the wake of the huge leaps forward made by Company of Heroes and Supreme Commander, this is exactly the kind of revitalisation to keep Empire Earth relevant in the modern age.

Empire Earth III trailer

Empire Earth 3 English Demo

Empire Earth III Download Links (RapidShare)

Empire Earth III Review and Download from RapidShare

Posted in Games | No Comments »

Top Tools:
Yahoo Video Downloader
YouTube Video Downloader
Youtube MP3 Converter
[This post is regularly updated.]
YouTube is the most popular site to visit for viewing online videos, sharing your favourite videos with people and commenting on videos you like. Recently YouTube was acquired by Google for a few billion dollars. Here is a collection of several YouTube third party tools which enhance your YouTube experience.

  • YouTube Userscripts - a collection of scripts to perform several tasks with YouTube.
  • Youtube Video Slideshow - insert a username or a video tag below and it starts a slideshow.
  • fTube - a YouTube player that downloads the list of 25 most recent videos featured on the YouTube front page. The user can select a video from the list and hit the play button to play it in-Flash.
  • TubeCH - YouTube flash player.
  • iTube - grab Youtube videos, then convert and import them into iTunes. Requires .Net framework and works exclusively on Windows.
  • PodTube - a Mac OS X program, downloads, encodes, and adds YouTube videos to your iTunes library but requires Safari to fetch the videos.
  • TvTube - For Mac users. Allows you to browse YouTube, Google Video and Yahoo Videos, for movie clips that people upload, choose your favorite clips and add them to your shared library.
  • YouTube API - XML Feed Ripper - PHP script that taps into the YouTube API to deliver videos by tag, by username or what’s a current favorite.
  • YouTube Widget - brings all of YouTubes videos to your Mac Dashboard.
  • Search The Tube - A quick way to find videos for your website, blog or profile.
  • YoutubeCrazyVideos - A Youtube videos desktop player. Freeware.
  • IndexTube - categorized and browsable index of the publicly available Youtube videos.
  • YouTube Podcaster - makes Podcast feed from your submitted keyword or url. The feed is made up from embedded youtube video IDs and all videos are converted to the MP4 file format.
  • MemoriesOnWeb - freeware photo slideshow software for YouTube.
  • Overstream - lets you add subtitles to online videos.

Integrate YouTube Into Your Site / Blog

  • YouTube badge maker - will show your viewers images of your 6 most recently uploaded videos.
  • YouTube Wordpress Plugin - Display YouTube videos on your Wordpress blog according to Tags.
  • YouTube Video Gallery Wordpress Plugin - displays a gallery of videos from youtube.com.
  • WordPress Related Videos Plugin- Uses tags to look for related videos on YouTube, displays the three most recent related videos on your WordPress blog post and updates videos automatically.
  • Wordpress Favourite YouTube Videos - Wordpress plugin / widget to display, in a very configurable manner, your latest favorite videos from Youtube.
  • Viper’s Video Quicktags - WP plugin that easily generates codes for copy / pasting to embed videos from sites like YouTube and Google Video or for self-hosted videos into your posts.
  • WP-FLV - Wordpress plugin simplfies the process of inserting flash video files (FLV) inside a Wordpress post or page.
  • TubePress - a highly configurable WordPress plugin that displays YouTube videos in an embedded gallery in posts and/or pages.

Download and Save YouTube Videos

  • Delutube - Deleted Youtube video viewer.
  • Video Downloader - a firefox extension that allows you to download videos to your computer from YouTube and most video sites.
  • YouTubeX - allows you to save and download YouTube videos easily using only your IE or firefox browser.
  • TubeSock - grabs YouTube videos from the web and copies them to your video iPod, Mac, or PlayStation Portable.
  • VideoDL - is a quick AJAX application that allows you to download online video into your computer. It supports top 3 video sites - YouTube, Google Video, and Break.com.
  • Download YouTube via bookmarklets - A collection of Greasemonkey scripts and bookmarklets to do the job.
  • Youtube-dl - is a small command-line program to download videos from YouTube.com. It requires the Python interpreter, version 2.4 or later.
  • KeepVid - Download videos direct from most video sites like YouTube.
  • YouTube Downloader - enter url and download YouTube videos.
  • Youtube Grabber - is a free tool that downloads FLV files from youtube.
  • GooTube FLV Retriever - enter the video page URL, download the youtube video.
  • Capture Youtube and Google videos - save them as AVI files encoded in the MPEG4 format, using only one command.
  • YouRipper - a freeware software which enables you to download videos from the YouTube and Google Video
  • Save YouTube Videos - paste the youtube video url and download the video.
  • Kyootoob - is a youtube downloader and optionally a converter.

Top / Best YouTube Videos

As of September 27, 2007, the most popular Bit Torrent search engine sites are listed below. This list is selected from hundreds of reader email suggestions, and is updated weekly. You are welcome to submit your suggestions for inclusion into this list.

This list is in random order. Special thanks to the many About.com readers who help keep this list current via their email submissions.

Warning for new users: while P2P file sharing technology is completely legal, many of the files traded through P2P are copyrighted. Unless you live in Canada where users are shielded from P2P lawsuits, then downloading P2P files may put you at risk for a civil lawsuit in any other country.

These lawsuits are usually class-action suits, filed against groups of users who blatantly copy and distribute copyrighted materials. Recently, the MPAA, the RIAA, and the governments of England and Australia took several thousand users to court, demanding that they pay thousands of dollars in copyright infringement penalties.

Your Internet Service Provider may, at their discretion, release their logs of your downloading activity to potential copyright plaintiffs. The more megabytes you download, the more you risk being sued by copyright protection groups. Please know this risk before you use any of the following Torrent search engines below.

  1. Demonoid Sep. 26, 2007 update: Demonoid.com is now offline. Details are forthcoming, but the rumor is that their Canadian ISP shut them down by court order. Fears are that the Canadian Recording Industry Association is behind this sudden shutdown.

  2. Torrentportal.com

  3. Torrentmatrix.com

  4. Torrentspy.com September 2007 update: Torrentspy has declared that it will be forbidding American users from doing searches on its website, under pressure from the MPAA.

  5. Isohunt.com
    September, 2007: Isohunt is barring American users from connecting to American torrent trackers. American users, however, can still use Isohunt to find torrents, and connect to third party trackers.
    July, 2007: Isohunt has over 450,000 torrents in their database. Also noteworthy: any Isohunt torrent listed as “ISOhunt release” means that it is a file verified by the administrators…a nice feature to help you locate authentic torrents and not fake files. On a sad note: Isohunt is being sued by the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) for copyright infringement. If you want to use this tremendous Canadian site, you better use it while you can.

  6. Torrentscan.com (a “meta-search” engine, which is a search engine that searches other search engines)

  7. Snarf It! (born from previous Suprnova influences)

  8. LegalTorrents.com (As the name implies, this is a database of public-domain content. Thanks to Anand S. for this URL.)

  9. Scrapetorrent.com is another torrent meta-search engine that is gaining popularity.

  10. Mininova.org has 190,000 torrents indexed as of April, 2007. Mininova is the successor to Suprnova, one of the original big torrent databases of the Web.

  11. Torrentreactor.to (Torrentreactor has made a comeback from a hijacking and an uncooperative hosting service. They have moved to a different server setup and a Tonga country domain outside the USA. Read the details on their home page.)

  12. Torrentz.com (special thanks to reader, Jonathan R., for this link)

  13. Torrents.to

  14. Torrentbox.com FYI: like Isohunt, Torrentbox is being sued by the MPAA as of February 28, 2006. The days for this fine search engine may be numbered.

  15. BTjunkie

  16. TorrentTyphoon.com (a unique bittorrent meta-search engine that searches several of the most popular sites. Unfortunately, it does not do a good job categorizing the torrent files themselves)

  17. The Pirate Bay (Pirate Bay, by readership size, is the most popular torrent search site today. Pirate Bay has an immense database of 600,000+ torrents, the largest database at this time.)
    (May 31, 2006: The Pirate Bay has been shut down by Swedish authorities. Details are available on the Pirate Bay home page.)
    (June 2006: The Pirate Bay has restarted operations, now that the police have duplicated the PB hard drives for forensic purposes. Enjoy this database while it is still around, folks!)

  18. ByTorrents Meta Search

  19. Thinktorrent.com

  20. FileList.org
  21. Yotoshi.com
  22. Meganova.org
  23. FileMP3.org
  24. TorrentBytes.net
  25. Torrent-damage.net
  26. FullDLS.com
  27. TopTorrents (has been down intermittently the last few weeks for unknown reasons.)
  28. Torrentlocomotive (special thanks to Juan C for the for this submission)
  29. BiteNova (formerly known as “Bi-Torrents”, BiteNova is a free Torrent site with a spartan look and fast searching format.)
  30. bittorrent.com (the official Torrent website by Bram Cohen, the designer of the Python BitTorrent format.)
  31. Fenopy (formerly Bitoogle.com) (the ‘original’ bittorrent search engine, which has now morphed into a metasearch engine. The results from your Bitoogle searches will point to various other torrent search sites. This site has been redirected recently.)
  32. BTbot.com (this site has been intimidated into listing fewer and fewer current torrents. The administrator was likely spooked by the recent wave of lawsuits against Isohunt and Pirate Bay)
  33. Special mention: Torrents.co.uk (This British site has been slow to load lately)
  34. Special mention: LokiTorrent.com (In a precedent-setting MPAA civil law suit, Loki has been shut down by court order as of Feb 10, 2005. To add insult to injury, the MPAA has left a trashy saber-rattling message at the lokitorrent home page in an attempt to intimidate other P2P users. P2P users everywhere are mourning the loss of this excellent service, and the MPAA is estranging even more Internet users with its heavy-handed campaign.)
  35. Special mention: Commonbits.com (This new beta search site is dedicated to media on progressive political content: audio, video, photos, reports, transcripts and other files. This is a place for activists to share their message, and for people to learn about other political choices.)

If you don’t like torrents try MP3 Fiesta. They hold nearly 67,000 albums from nearly 17,000 artists. Prices are around the $0.10 mark for single tracks with full albums coming in at roughly $1.00. Tracks are available from 192kbps and they take major credit cards and PayPal

The Most Popular Bit Torrent P2P Software

Here they are: the most popular ‘Music Pirate’ downloading software for torrent file sharing. This list is compiled from hundreds of user comments and reader suggestions.

  1. uTorrent
    (Known as both “u-torrent” and “micro torrent”, this is the most popular torrent tool today. uTorrent has all the functions a torrent downloader will ever need, and it only requires 1 MB of hard drive space and memory. uTorrent has all the downloading and seeding performance of its competitors, but with minimal impact to the rest of your computer’s speed.)
  2. BitComet
    (Good, but losing popularity to uTorrent)
  3. ABC
    (Another very popular Torrent client)
  4. BitLord
    (A popular tool that has a built-in torrent search engine…you may never need to use a torrent search web site ever again with this product)
  5. TurboBT
    (Nice-looking GUI appearance with this package)
  6. Azureus
    (A Java language client; was considered “king” of the torrent programs until uTorrent software came along and took that crown away. As with uTorrent and any other software you install, ensure that you virus scan.)
  7. The Original BitTorrent Client
    (Authored by Bram Cohen himself; no fancy GUI here, but it downloads quickly. Recommended for programmer types and Macintosh users)

Another 10 Amazing Torrent Sites

1. Torrentz

Alexa Rank: 1492

2. Mininova

Alexa Rank: 290

3. ThePirateBay

Alexa Rank: 427

4. Torrentspy

Alexa Rank: 470

5. Isohunt

Alexa Rank: 720

6. Meganova

Alexa Rank: 8970

7. Bitenova

Alexa Rank: 11558

8. BitTorrent

Alexa Rank: 1468

9. Torrentbox

Alexa Rank: 4360

10. TorrentReactor

Alexa Rank: 9103

10.1 Fenopy

10.2 SumoTorrent

10.3 Snarf-It

10.4 www.teletorrents.org

Warning: while P2P file sharing technology is completely legal, many of the files traded through P2P are copyrighted. Unless you live in Canada where citizens are shielded from P2P copyright lawsuits, downloading music, movie, and TV files will put you at risk for a civil lawsuit in any other country. These lawsuits usually take the form of class-action suits, filed against groups of users who are logged as blatantly copying and distributing copyrighted materials. Recently, the MPAA and RIAA, along with the governments of England and Australia, took several thousand users to court, demanding that they pay thousands of dollars in copyright infringement penalties. Please keep this lawsuit risk in mind when you install and use any BitTorrent software in the USA, Europe, or Asia.